top of page
Search

Buried Twice: Inside the Suzanne Morphew Murder Mystery That Still Haunts Colorado

Updated: Aug 17

ree

It was May 10, 2020 — Mother’s Day. In Chaffee County, Colorado, the morning broke with that deceptive quiet that only later reveals its weight.

Suzanne Morphew, forty-nine, left her home, allegedly for a bike ride. Her husband Barry said it was routine. But hours passed. No one saw her return.

Then came the first “clue” — her bike, found abandoned along a dirt road. At first glance, it screamed accident. Maybe she’d been forced off by an animal. Maybe she’d fallen and wandered.

But the absence of the usual markers — no blood, no drag marks, no footprints leading away — gnawed at the detectives. When I looked at those initial findings, one thought wouldn’t leave me: this bike didn’t end a story. It was planted to begin one.

Suzanne’s Life Before the Vanishing

To understand why this case shook the nation, you have to understand Suzanne. She wasn’t someone likely to vanish without explanation. She was a mother of two teenage daughters, a devoted sister, a woman friends described as vibrant, empathetic, and deeply rooted in her community.

She ran a small artisanal business, kept meticulous routines, and never missed Sunday family gatherings. To the outside world, she was dependable. Inside her marriage, though, cracks had already formed.

Diaries revealed she was considering divorce. Friends told police she felt increasingly trapped. Digital records showed private conversations where she questioned her marriage’s future.

Here’s the chilling thought: Suzanne might have been planning her exit from the marriage. But instead, someone planned her permanent exit from life.

The Husband Who Shifted Shapes

From the very first hours, Barry Morphew’s behavior raised red flags.

  • He claimed he was out of town on a landscaping job when Suzanne disappeared.

  • His timeline of phone calls and movements contained gaps investigators couldn’t reconcile.

  • He refused some volunteer searchers and grew defensive when neighbors offered help.

At first, Barry cried on camera, pleaded for Suzanne’s safe return. But as weeks turned into months, his story kept changing.

Theories of a mountain lion attack or a voluntary disappearance were floated. But no expert backed them. By the fall of 2020, the spotlight had narrowed to Barry — and the inconsistencies in his own words.

A Community Divided

In small communities, suspicion spreads quickly. At first, neighbors rallied behind Barry. He was a husband in pain, after all. But over time, whispers began:

  • Why was he so reluctant to let volunteers search certain areas?

  • Why did his behavior shift from desperate husband to defensive suspect?

  • Why did money start moving in strange ways — with sudden cash withdrawals?

The same community that once hugged him at prayer vigils began crossing the street to avoid him.

Forensics Don’t Lie: The Wildlife Tranquilizer

The turning point came three years later, in 2023. Suzanne’s remains were discovered in a remote site. What shocked investigators wasn’t just that her body was there. It was what science revealed.

Her bones carried traces of chemicals consistent with wildlife tranquilizers.

That detail is everything. This wasn’t a spontaneous crime of passion. This was calculated. Pre-meditated. Someone had access to substances meant to bring down animals — and allegedly used them on Suzanne.

And who had access? Barry. Through his landscaping and outdoor work, he was familiar with wildlife control.

This revelation stripped away the last credibility from theories of random abduction. This wasn’t random. It was personal.

Disturbed Earth: The Two Graves

If the tranquilizer evidence was chilling, the burial story was haunting.

Soil analysis showed her body had been moved. First buried in a shallow grave. Later dug up and relocated to a second site.

Imagine the psychological state of someone willing to do that: to return to the body of a spouse, exhume it, and attempt to outsmart investigators by hiding it again. That isn’t panic. That is calculation.

It tells us two things:

  1. The killer underestimated forensic science.

  2. They overestimated their ability to erase truth with dirt.

The Psychological Profile of Control

Looking at this case through a psychological lens, a portrait emerges. If Barry is indeed guilty as prosecutors allege, what do his actions suggest?

  • Control: Moving the body, staging the bike, changing stories — all point to someone desperate to control the narrative.

  • Projection: Suggesting she had a “habit” of disappearing — when she never had — looks like deflection.

  • Entitlement: The tranquilizer evidence, if true, indicates a mindset that viewed Suzanne as an obstacle to be subdued, not a partner with autonomy.

In psychology, this aligns with traits of coercive control often found in domestic abuse cases: manipulation, isolation, control of resources, and finally, erasure of autonomy through violence.

The Legal Battlefield

By mid-2025, prosecutors filed a new indictment. It alleged not just homicide, but deliberate evidence tampering.

  • Two burial sites: proof of concealment.

  • Digital inconsistencies: deleted messages, suspicious pings.

  • Financial irregularities: unexplained cash withdrawals.

Barry’s defense argued lack of direct physical evidence. They pointed out no eyewitness saw him commit the act. They questioned whether soil disturbance could be misinterpreted.

The case now teeters between circumstantial evidence stacking high and the defense’s claim of reasonable doubt.

The Family’s Silent Agony

For Suzanne’s daughters, the case is unbearable. They’ve lost their mother. They face the possibility their father killed her.

In courtrooms, their faces appear pale, caught between love and grief, loyalty and truth. Family friends have described their torment: “They just want answers. They want peace.”

When I spoke with people close to them, the word “betrayal” surfaced often. Not just the betrayal of a father’s alleged actions, but the betrayal of time itself — years of unanswered questions.

Why This Case Matters Beyond Colorado

The Suzanne Morphew case isn’t just about one family. It raises larger questions about:

  • Domestic homicide: How many victims vanish under the guise of “accidents”?

  • Forensic advances: How new tools like soil stratigraphy and toxicology can break cold cases.

  • Justice delayed: What happens when prosecutors file charges years later — after community patience has frayed?

It’s a case that highlights the fragility of truth — and the persistence of science in bringing it to light.

Unanswered Questions That Linger

Even with indictments, mysteries remain:

  • Why did Barry allegedly choose tranquilizers instead of more direct methods?

  • Did anyone else know about the first burial site?

  • What was the exact timeline between death and relocation?

  • Could Suzanne have confided plans for divorce that sparked premeditation?

These aren’t just details. They’re the threads that may decide conviction or acquittal.

Final Thought: A Truth That Refuses to Stay Buried

Suzanne Morphew’s story is haunting not just because of what happened, but because of how long it took to emerge.

She vanished on a quiet spring morning. She was buried not once, but twice. Her memory was meant to be erased by dirt and silence.

But science refused to forget. Evidence whispered where witnesses could not.

And now, years later, Suzanne is finally speaking — through soil layers, chemical traces, and the cracks in a husband’s story.

The question remains: will a jury hear her voice clearly enough to deliver justice?


  • Suzanne Morphew case

  • true crime Colorado

  • Chaffee County disappearance

  • Mother’s Day mystery

  • Barry Morphew trial

  • buried twice murder case

  • tranquilizer forensic evidence

  • domestic homicide investigation

  • Colorado cold case

  • murder mystery blog


Sources

Comments

bottom of page